Stockton Press Journals What's New Subscribe Information SEARCH
Journal Home
Contents
Journal of Human Hypertension
January 2001, Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 27 - 36
PreviousArticleNext   (PDF)
Title

Abstract

Keywords

 
 
Title

Assessing hypertension management in the community: trends of prevalence, detection, treatment, and control of hypertension in the MONICA Project, Augsburg 1984–1995

C Gasse1,2, H-W Hense2, J Stieber3, A Döring3, AD Liese2 & U Keil2

1Department of Internal Medicine VI, Clinical Pharmacology & Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Germany

2Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Germany

3GSF-National Research Center, Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Neuherberg, Germany

Correspondence to: Dr Hans-Werner Hense, University of Münster, Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, D-48129 Münster, Germany. Fax: +49 251 835 5300, E-mail: hense@uni-muenster.de


Abstract

Objective: To assess trends in prevalence and detection, treatment and control of hypertension in a German population between 1984 and 1995.

Setting and participants: Independent random samples of the population were examined in cross-sectional surveys with identical methods in 1984/85 (age range 25 to 64 years, n = 4022 participants), 1989/90 (age range 25 to 74 years, n = 4940) and 1994/95 (age range 25 to 74 years, n = 4856).

Main outcome measures: Prevalence of hypertension and proportions of hypertensives detected, treated and controlled. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure above 140/90 mm Hg or taking antihypertensive medication.

Results: The prevalence of hypertension did not change significantly over the 10 years (25–64 years, age-standardised 1984/85: 37.8% in men and 24.6% in women; 1994/95: 39.3% and 24.8%, respectively). Rates of detection, treatment and control of hypertension did not change much either. Of all hypertensives in 1994/95, 54% were detected in men and 64% in women, the treatment rates were 23% and 32%, and the proportions of those with controlled hypertension (below 140/90 mm Hg with treatment) were as low as 7% and 13%, respectively. Rates were higher in the older age groups, however, control rates never exceeded 20% at any age.

Conclusions: Despite considerable changes in the pharmacological treatment of hypertension there was a disappointing stagnation with regard to the management of this important risk factor in the community. The reasons for this unfavourable trend need clarification and appropriate public health action.

Journal of Human Hypertension (2001) 15, 27–36

Keywords
antihypertensive treatment; population study; prevalence; detection and control


Received 13 April 2000; Revised 19 May 2000; Accepted 30 June 2000


© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2001